Hero Image
- Fawk

Hackers (1995)

Let’s get this out of the way: “Hackers” is nonsense—the kind of sprightly, neon-smeared nonsense that only the ‘90s, flush with dot-com optimism and cyberpunk delusions, could have produced. But what nonsense! Iain Softley’s 1995 ode to digital counterculture is the movie equivalent of pounding a can of Jolt cola at four in the morning, the terminal’s glow making you believe—for just those few hours—that the entire universe can be reprogrammed by teenage renegades with snark and rollerblades.

I have to confess: I fell, hard, for that fantasy. If Hollywood lied about a lot of things (love, war, Wall Street), it was never more deliriously enthusiastic than in its lie that hacking was the stuff of wild, rave-soaked glamor. The real world for us digital denizens looked more like a smoke-choked den of hunched, grimy nerds—monitors flickering, fans wheezing, and so many Marlboros curling in the ashtray that OSHA would have needed a hazmat team to find the mouse. But no matter: when I plugged into “Hackers,” I believed, with all the fervor of a convert, that my own haphazard IT existence might—just might—be as cool as what Crash Override and Acid Burn were up to on those giant CRTs. The film ignited something—an itch that drove me into a decade-long career in IT, chronicled by oceans of code, late-night caffeinated rituals, and more than a touch of wishful thinking about finding an Angelina Jolie in the server room. (Spoiler: I did not.)

What “Hackers” possesses, in spades, is a giddy faith in misfits coming together to conquer the world. Jonny Lee Miller brings a jittery, feral charisma to Dade Murphy, the wunderkind desperate to outrun both his past (once “Zero Cool,” now rebranded with the adolescent bravado of “Crash Override”) and the digital heat put on him by every parental figure in the Eastern Time Zone. Angelina Jolie, so androgynous and kinetic she seems half-wired into the motherboard herself, is “Acid Burn”—a girl whose handle is less a name than a dare. Together they lead a cast of hacker archetypes stuffed into New York’s grimiest corners: Matthew Lillard’s manic Cereal Killer, L.J. Mason’s all-seeing Lord Nikon, Renoly Santiago’s Phantom Phreak. These are not “characters” in the sense that Chekhov wrote them—they’re cartoon spirits with cheekbones and jargon, surfing a world that never existed… except, perhaps, on our feverish, sleep-deprived nights in the mid-‘90s.

The plot? A wafer-thin excuse for techno-chaos. It begins with a contest to see who can humiliate a Secret Service agent more extravagantly—a Homeric test of bravado that, naturally, spirals into Rupert Murdoch-worthy headlines. When Fisher Stevens slithers onto the screen as “The Plague,” you want to cheer: rarely has a villain so reveled in his own camp, as if he escaped from a Sega Genesis cartridge and landed in a John Hughes movie. He’s not threatening. He’s exuberant—a grown-up who’s been waiting his whole life to play the world’s sleaziest sysadmin. You root for him, almost as much as for the kids. How much did I want to be The Plague? Not enough to blackmail corporations, but enough to long for his braggadocio, his gleeful command center—a grown-up’s fantasy of what it means to be the cool operator.

But the real commodity here isn’t suspense or realism—it’s a sense of tribe. “Hackers” is about the delight of finding your people, of crafting a world out of usernames and shared obsessions. The handles—Acid Burn, Cereal Killer—are self-chosen identities, an answer to a mundane world that has no use for the awkward, the driven, the digitally obsessed. For those of us whose adolescence hinged on IRC channels and the dopamine drip of the modem handshake, “Hackers” is almost a mirror—if a slightly warped, disco-flecked one.

Softley bathes the film in visual hyperbole—a New York City abstracted to a playground, cyberspace that looks like the love child of Tron and MoMA, and hacking sequences that are beautiful, absurd ballets of swirl and burn. Green text, spinning cubes, skulls flying by at the speed of caffeine—it’s all sheer cyber pulp. It is, in a word, ridiculous. But what did you want—UNIX architecture? This is rock-and-roll for the desktop age, and the soundtrack, laced with Prodigy and Orbital, pulses so hard you half expect your speakers to grow glow-sticks.

Now, let’s not delude ourselves: “Hackers” isn’t Citizen Kane with a boot disk. The plot is holy Swiss cheese, its technological veracity is somewhere on par with a Hanna-Barbera cartoon, and if you asked an actual hacker to follow along, you’d be wading through enough head-slapping leaps of logic to trigger carpal tunnel. But for some of us, it was a call. An invitation to pick up a keyboard and believe—truly believe—that what you did in the small hours, surrounded by ancient hardware and the clatter of keys, was a way to make a mark on the world.

It’s also a film, for all its posturing, that brims with inclusivity and warmth. Miller and Jolie crackle; the supporting cast pirouettes through memorable, oddball turns; and if Stevens is a villain, he’s one drawn in lipstick and glitter, not blood. The humor is self-aware, and the whole enterprise refuses—blessedly—to take itself too seriously. If “Hackers” is mediocre as cinema, it is sublime as sentiment. It makes you long not just for what was—but for how it felt to be hungry, to belong, to chase a world that seemed so, so much bigger than parental control or school administrators or the slow crawl of LAN transfer rates.

To say “Hackers” changed my life is to say too much—and not enough. It was the spark, the nudge. It’s why I ran, greasy and grinning, toward a career in technology. It’s also why, thirty years later and miles from IT, I still operate websites on the side—still chasing that digital magic on my own time, because it’s the thing that comes closest to play.

To call “Hackers” a classic is to miss the point. It’s a cult object, a time capsule dusted with the hopeful folly of a generation. Its technical blunders are dwarfed by its incandescence, its invitation to try, to test, to play, to become. For me, there are bigger, greater, and more accomplished movies. There are very few that feel so singularly my own.

So, cue the thumping score, dial up, and let Crash and Burn hack the planet for you, one more time. If we’re lucky, maybe we get a whiff of that magic again—however brief, however illusory. For that, I’m grateful. For that, I’ll keep coming back, modem hissing, screen flickering, cigarette smoke curling above the keyboard, smile just a little too wide.

In the end, I don’t need “Hackers” to be real. I only need it to be mine. And, for a couple of wild, electric hours, it always is.

Other Related Posts:

Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (2024)

Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (2024)

Soi Cheang’s Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In is a brash, full-throttle collision—Gangs of New York after a few rounds with Kung Fu Hustle. What a galvanizing jolt to the system: to step into a movie that practically dares you to remember your youth, back when Hong Kong cinema was deliriously off the leash, and the formula for a good time was a heroic bloodbath, some dirt under the nails, and a soundtrack of testosterone and betrayal. Here, Cheang invites us to mainline nostalgia—this is genre-movie pleasure as pure, as heady, as chow fun in a back alley at 2 a.m.

17th Nov 2024 - Fawk
The Substance (2024)

The Substance (2024)

Coralie Fargeat’s “The Substance” doesn’t so much open as splatter all over you—like the world’s glitziest acid reflux. Within minutes, you’re somewhere between elation and nausea, the kind that reminds you why you ever loved horror in the first place: it’s meant to rattle not just your nerves but your very sense of what it means to be flesh and woman and watched. Walk in expecting a demure little metaphor about aging, and you’ll find your hands, as mine were, gripping the seat in a bright, queasy trance.

2nd Dec 2024 - Fawk